Monday, February 23, 2009

marna padega sabko..

let them die.. let us all die.. i will die..
die die die

consider reproduction:

asexual: one mother creates two daughter.. two line.. if one line has better mutation , it survives and the other line dies..(but mutations are rare..)
consider if both lines have two different mutations.. both beneficial for survival... then both lineages will survive but then the good genes would never mix.. because no sex.. so this aint so good.. and since very little genetic diversity, any abrupt change in environment can wipe out the entire population.. so not good for evolution

sexual: requires two different kinds of individuals with differently developed organs, time is required for courting/mating etc etc.. basically cumbersome because of time required and the chance factor.. (what are the chances of finding the rght mate(read falling in love) at a given place? - you will eventually find one, but the point is that it takes time.. so population grows slowly)

so in old days one male with good genes mates with a female with good genes and produces child(ren). these original parents with one good gene each are allowed to mate with other males and females to produce more and more kids (we were originally promiscuous .. and still are subconsciously - brave new world) one of these kids has the best genes.. so he/she lives longer (ie is brave so isnt killed in some acccident or can resist disease better) .. so for this new good mutation to be passed one, one requires that this one guy have many children and he should pass on his gene to them. Then these children mate with others of the population and then the new population all have these genes. This means that others who do not have this gene must die out..(unlike in asexual reproduction, parents divide into two children, so no one dies) .. hence this also means, each of the "selected" guys parent must die out eventually because each of them have only one good gene..

so death is important for sexual reproduction to be beneficial.. good genes only propogate when others without that gene die out.. hahah

so in olden days of monkeying around, death was easy - climate change, accident because of falling from trees, fights etc etc...

now a days, we are civilized... we try to save even those who have birth defects (unprivileged ones with bad genes) .. we condem them and their parents to a sad/pathetic life... this aint what nature wanted..

in olden times a handicapped born child (blind, deaf, lame) would easily fall prey to so many possible death and hence would be weeded out by nature itself...

but now, we want to conquer nature... instead of euthanizing the disabled at birth, we want to let them survive because its morally "incorrect"... balls to morals..

morals (result of male ego?) prevent you from being promiscuous ... which isnt good because if you and your 1 or kids (all from same spouse) die... your whole lineage is gone... maybe you had a good gene.. so now its gone... bad for humans..

and besides, its taboo to have more than 2 kids...
and even if you have 5 kids.. all other millions of humans on this earth have to die for them to keep surviving into the future with all their good genes...

so now we have like in this world of 6.6 billion people, tens of thousands of isolated lines of good gene lineages which rarely interact with each other (good gene may interact with bad gene lines to become extinct or with normal gened people to continue.. chances of two good gene people interacting with each other is less)..

so now with so many good genes we have in our population, none of them would be able to proliferate all thru the human population because for that two happen, millions of death should occur fast.. like a catastrophe....

so maybe some one will now really blast a couple of nuclear weapons.. atleast then the humans would be reduced to a managable number and then they would leave their morals aside and males and females will have a huge orge and fuck each other and then atleast 4-5 of those thousands of genes would proliferate thru all of humans and then atleast then humans would come out better... we can then have more mass extinctions again and again to ensure good genes prolifrate thru the populations (i know its random wiping of humans, and some good gene lineages would die out, but then better that then prventing any good genes from prolifrating )

so mass extinctions are required.. maybe a comet with hit earth soon...

maybe religion was a safe guard for humans so that morals dont prevent mankind from killing most part of itself... otherwise how would natural selection proceed

maybe this is the function of ego (another reason for war and hence mass extinction) at a macro level...

so we need to find a way to artificially perform genetic therapy (replace bad genes with good genes or simple introduce good genes) into full adult humans..
in case we arent able to do it in the near future, someone will have to kill most of us all soon enough... because that might be the right thing to do...

anyone needs a idea?... target the slums... kill'em all, but before that survey the slum populations and take out the people with best genetic codes (they will - in all that shit and filth - surely have males and females who are able to resist disease much better than any of us...) and keep them save along with the most beautiful (and most intelligent ) men and women of the would

then after the apocalypse, you can force them to interbreed... to product nice good humans.... reminds me of that bond movie - moonraker

there has to be a better way to do it without destroying the planet...

in anycase, i guess i am a waste... i dont mind if i am killed for such a cause...

3 comments:

ANOOP said...

hmmm dude!! finally i read it...............
well i ev added it in mah favourates!

keep blogging

paragdgala said...

one of my fav topics to discuss when i have nothing to do... we share many of those i guess.

i disagree on the pt tht ppl with not-so-good genes have to be killed. let nature decide who has to die, not us. we do not have the rights decide who has these not-so-good genes. a handicapped person does not have bad genes (as seems apparent from your post) and should nt be euathanized, let nature take care of tht (ya, i disagree they should receive 'excessive' medical help) best example ever for current times: Stephen Hawkings.... more of this argument can be found in the survival of the fittest theory by Charles Darwin, who recently celebrated his 200th b'day.

secondly, the neanderthal man 9 or was it cro-magnon) had a slightly larger brain to mass index as compared to you or me or anyone reading this. which means they probably had the largest brain to mass index when they existed. yet they got extinct with no much of benefits passed to us. why? .. ok just back from wiki. its neanderthal. they also had better physical struct compared to curr human population. why did they go vanish? possible answers: genocide, natural disasters (wkik: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_extinction_hypotheses). hmmm, i see you are the last surviving neanderthal now. if true, there might be a limit to this brain to mass index number. the higher the number goes, there is this apocalypse as you suggest. the race gets extinct. and the index number falls down. Good genes dont propogate. Is that smart? Does that serve your purpose?

Natural disasters... They do have the potential to wash out the good genes. I dont want to comment on this; you know why. 'nuff said.

The Lithiumhead said...

imagine 10,000 people have good genes .. all different good genes out of 6.65 billion people on this planet...
those people will pass on those genes to there kids and so on ... very rarely would more than 2 or 3 of those genes would end up simultaneously in a given individual....

so what would be the most natural way for those genes to combine?

that we kill 90% of the population

the we will have 665 million people and only 1000 of them would have good gene...
now since the population has decreased, we would have to repopulate the planet...
so everyone would start having kids like mad...

so now instead of having 1 or 2 kids, everyone one will have 5 kids .. so those 1000 good gened people will pass on their good genes to many people

but then the bad gene people would reproduce like crazy... but hoping its an apocalyptic future, there is a better change of good gened people (more brains, more strength or resistance to radition to disease) and their kids to survive... others would die of cancer and other disease...

may be then the good genes would have a chance to prolifrate the population... less people might mean less pollution... so save the planet.. but saala massive floods due to greenhouse effect ki wajah se waat lagi toh fir earth would already be a lost cause...

anyway... obiously my theory doesnt sound convincing even to myself...

but yeah, people should get their genes tested before having sex to have a baby...
because then atleast if they have some defective gene.. then its their responsibility to kill the gene and take it along with them to the grave...

its the morals tat you must propagate and not the gene... so better adopt a kid...and teach him all the things you know and believe in..
main toh aise hi karunga boss... but then we have to wait till the procedure for genetic defect screening becomes more developed... obviously i know i dont have any of the most common genetic disorders.. but then there might be some which are lesser known and can occur randomly and not so life threatening.. but then studying science, its our moral obligation to atleast apply it in practise...

well that obligation urges me to use electrical appliances with a unity power factor... but then india mein yeah sab kahan milta hai

atleast if i stay in delhi in my own bungalow, i can cover my roof with solar cell and harvest rainwater... but in mumbai, its just not possible..
too many people .. no space...i detest the city... yet i am addicted to it.. maybe someday i will have to leave it to purse things i believe in.. but i will keep returning to it...

feels like frankeinstein now.. with heart pumping a shitty brown liquid instead of blood thru my veins...
(why did i see slumdog... ) cant live without that liquid i guess... take it in everyday i travel thru the city
via the air..

makes you wonder... is it the fresh air i am breathing in ? or is the city using me to clean the air with my body acing like a filter thru which the pollutants get removed from air...

my lungs are black, eyes are red, nostril are full of black gluck, throat always has some new germ on the block and stomach is always relenting...

we need that fucking metro and flyovers right now... and need to dump those cars and autos in the sea like the tetrapods at marine drive to keep from the rising waters...

bachaooooooooo

anurag